Skip to main content
Recent Posts
91
Tech News / Facebook to “fact-check” and suppress individual users
Last post by Anon -
Facebook to “fact-check” and suppress individual users

https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-personal-accounts-misinformation/

https://about.fb.com/news/2021/05/taking-action-against-people-who-repeatedly-share-misinformation/

Quote
Personal Facebook accounts that are flagged by Facebook’s fact-checkers for repeatedly sharing “misinformation” will now have all their posts suppressed in the news feed as part of the tech giant’s latest crackdown on content that challenges the narratives of its fact-checking partners.

Facebook also announced that it will start dissuading its users from liking pages that are flagged by its fact-checkers via a pop-up that forces users to complete an additional step before they can like the page. When users attempt to like flagged pages, this pop up appears, tells users that the page has “repeatedly shared false information,” and asks them to choose whether to “Go Back” or “Follow Page Anyway.”

Quote
Additionally, the tech giant will start presenting users with a redesigned notification when their posts are flagged by fact-checkers. This new notification will encourage users to view the fact-check and delete their post.

Quote
The targeting of personal accounts is one of the most far-reaching Facebook censorship measures to date with an enforcement measure that previously only affected pages, groups, and domains, now applying to all of Facebook’s 2.8 billion users.

Facebook’s announcement comes days after one of its third-party fact-checkers, Politifact, quietly walked back its Wuhan lab leak fact-check.

For over a year, countless Facebook users have had their posts censored based on this fact-check which branded the idea that COVID-19 was created in a lab as a “debunked conspiracy theory.” But now that the mainstream media and fact-checkers have finally admitted this may not be a conspiracy, they’re allowed to discuss the Wuhan lab leak as a potential coronavirus cause with impunity.

Those who were censored based on this retracted fact-check would have had the reach of their flagged posts slashed by as much as 95%. And under Facebook’s new rule targeting personal account, entire accounts could now be suppressed based on erroneous fact-checks.
92
Political News / Re: Media face hard questions on Trump, Wuhan lab
Last post by Anon -
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/us-sitting-raft-unexamined-virus-origin-intel-former-official-says-almost-no-evidence

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/coronavirus-origins-intelligence.html

https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-lab-theory-allowed/

https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/coronavirus/china-pushes-back-after-biden-administration-seeks-intelligence-on-covid-19-origin/

Also remember stuff like: https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-told-labs-to-destroy-coronavirus-samples-to-reduce-biosafety-risks-11589684291
93
News / Re: April 7th, 2021 - Chat Has Gone Private
Last post by Anon -
Sounds interesting.
i would love to give this a try.
Thankyou Admin

Hello Admin! Would also love to get an invitation link! I will definitely follow all the rules. Thanks in advance! 😁

I'd like to request an invite as well.

i would need a invite as well

Sent you 4 chat invite links.
95
Computer & Network Security / Re: Admin login site is not secure?
Last post by Anon -
Most IPs aren't going to use a valid SSL certificate because they are typically issued to just domains. So I'm not surprised at all that 192.168.0.1 is saying insecure. It either doesn't have an SSL certificate at all or its using a self-signed one and not one issued by a verified source like LetsEncrypt. So no I don't think this is anything for you to worry about. This is normal and expected behavior, especially if the router is older.