Skip to main content
Topic: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator (Read 209 times) previous topic - next topic

RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login



Quote
The RIAA is attempting to unmask the operator of YouTube ripping site YouTubNow. The popular platform receives around 15 million visits per month but now stands accused of infringing RIAA members' copyrights by offering content by Gloria Estefan, Robert Palmer and Nu Shooz, among others.

Stream-ripping tools have become a big deal for the music industry over the past several years.

Instead of having to revisit platforms like YouTube, Spotify or Deezer, users of ripping tools or sites are able to download content to their own machines. The labels argue this deprives artists and indeed platforms of revenue while breaching music licensing conditions.

Perhaps the biggest problem is presented by sites that allow people to rip content from YouTube, whether that’s video or audio, or audio alone. While this can be for legitimate purposes, millions use stream-ripping platforms to obtain copyrighted content for free.

One such site is YouTube-ripping service YouTubNow.com. According to SimilarWeb stats, the site currently receives around 15 million visits per month, with the highest share of its visitors hailing from the U.S.

“YouTubNow is a powerful service that allows you to find and download your favorite YouTube videos as well as music tracks quickly, easily and absolutely for free,” the site’s promo material reads.

“It’s an excellent YouTube to MP3 downloader as it makes any soundtrack a separate audio file tailored especially for you!”

This clearly isn’t something the RIAA appreciates. The music industry group targeted YouTubNow last week via a DMCA subpoena directed at the site’s domain name registrar, NameCheap.

In common with a similar process aimed at file-hosting platform NoFile and first reported here on TF, the RIAA filed its request at a federal court in Columbia, demanding that NameCheap hands over the personal details of its client. The Court was happy to oblige.

“We believe your service is hosting [YouTubNow.com] on its network,” a subsequent RIAA letter to NameCheap reads.

“The website associated with this domain name offers files containing sound recordings which are owned by one or more of our member companies and have not been authorized for this kind of use, including without limitation those referenced at the URL below.”

It isn’t clear whether the RIAA has already filed any DMCA takedown notices with YouTubNow via the email address published on the site. Nevertheless, from the ‘copyright notice’ published on the site itself, YouTubNow claims no responsibility for what users do with the service.

At users’ own risk….
From the wording of the letter sent to NameCheap and the subpoena itself, the RIAA appears more concerned about the entire YouTubNow service, rather than just a few seemingly random URLs.

“The purpose for which this subpoena is sought is to obtain the identity of the individual assigned to this website who has induced the infringement of, and has directly engaged in the infringement of, our members’ copyrighted sound recordings without their authorization,” the RIAA writes.

In addition to demanding the operator’s name, physical address, IP address, telephone number, email address, payment information, account updates and account history, the RIAA suggests a termination of the service’s domain might also be in order.

“We also ask that you consider the widespread and repeated infringing nature of the site operator(s)’ conduct, and whether the site(s)’ activities violate your terms of service and/or your company’s repeat infringer policy,” the RIAA writes.

This is at least the third DMCA subpoena the RIAA has obtained against allegedly-infringing sites in recent weeks. TF previously reported that the group is targeting several ‘pirate’ sites that use Cloudflare and file-hosting platform NoFile.

A copy of the RIAA’s letter, obtained by TF, is available here (pdf)

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #1
doesn't mozilla host youtube mp3 downloader extensions for firefox? what's the difference?

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
doesn't mozilla host youtube mp3 downloader extensions for firefox? what's the difference?
 And there's external programs (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) to do it too. I'm assuming the site hosts the files as well instead of just ripping them?

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #3
These 3 sites are all better anyways...

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #4
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And there's external programs (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) to do it too. I'm assuming the site hosts the files as well instead of just ripping them?

right they probably host them for when youtube takes them down. but if not, what is the big deal?

I like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #5
yes, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login is great too, forgot about that one.

Re: RIAA Obtains Subpoena to Unmask YouTube-Ripping Site Operator

Reply #6
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
yes, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login is great too, forgot about that one.

are there some videos that you can't download w/ a FF extension or from these other sites? still wondering why they are going after this site if it isn't hosting anything